Monday, October 27, 2014

Blog 7 Health Care Injustice in US

Health Care Injustice










  The more I read, the more eye opening opportunities I have.  Most of the time it is a status quo of a society built on race and gender discrimination where people of color are suffering in all aspects of life including health care.  Those people are living in a very hard situation that contributing to less fortunate conditions with education, employment, housing and also health care.
                                                                                                                                                                                                                             "Of all the forms of inequality, injustice in health care is the most shocking and inhumane." -- Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr.
 
 African Americans have higher death rates than whites from cancer (1/4 higher), heart disease (1/3 higher), diabetes (twice as high), homicide (more than 5 times as high), and AIDS (more than 8 times as high).  The infant mortality rate for the African Americans was, in 2002-2003, over twice as high as for whites.  In all, the lower you are in a social hierarchy, the worse your health and the shorter your life is likely to be.


Many factors contribute to racial, ethnic, and socioeconomic health disparities, including inadequate access to care, poor quality of care, community features (such as poverty and violence) and personal behaviors. These factors are often associated with underserved racial and ethnic minority groups, individuals who have experienced economic obstacles, those with disabilities and individuals living within medically underserved communities.  Consequently, individuals living in both urban and rural areas may experience health disparities.
Despite ongoing efforts to reduce health disparities in the United States, racial and ethnic disparities in both health and health care persist. Even when income, health insurance and access to care are accounted for, disparities remain.  Low performance on a range of health indicators—such as infant mortality, life expectancy, prevalence of chronic disease, and insurance coverage—reveal differences between racial and ethnic minority populations and their white counterparts.

Jennifer Ng’andu, deputy director of the Health Policy Project at the National Council of La Raza in Washington, speaks even more pointedly: “If we look at communities of color, we see that many racial and ethnic groups live in unsafe environments, there is poor housing and there is loss of productivity because of illness.
“Essentially, every time a person of color goes to the doctor, 30 percent of their bill is due to health disparities so they end up paying more in the doctor’s office because over time they receive health care that is not appropriate or effective,” she says. “They become needlessly sicker and are more likely to die prematurely, so they end up paying more medical expenses.”
Health experts and civic leaders say financial strains are adversely manifested in varying ways in communities and have a huge impact on children, often involving academic performance.
“There are direct biological consequences in that a child who does not have good access to health services will experience developmental setbacks because they are sick or their parents are sick,” Ng’andu says. “It makes it harder for them to achieve in school and can have serious consequences on their future. We have to invest in children early, their health early, their education, making sure they have healthy communities to grow in.”

Ng’andu agrees. “When kids are hungry, when they are exposed to serious nerve stress and environmental stresses,” she says, “it affects them and their ability to learn and perform well academically. Investment in their health is very important to their future success and achievement and also their ability to work and contribute to their communities.”
Hernandez-Cancio says disparities in infant mortality rates also take a toll on minority families. While the 2010 rate for whites was 5.63 per 1,000 live births, it was 13.31 per 1,000 live births for African-Americans, 9.22 for American Indians or Alaska Natives and 7.71 for Puerto Ricans, according to the CDC.
“The infant mortality rate is considered a very basic measure of how a country’s health care system is working, and it is an indication of other symptoms,” she says. “We rank 41st globally. As an advanced, wealthy nation, we are not doing well.”
With the quotation said by Martin Luther King, Jr, hasn't the prejudice that prevailed in those far off times been eliminated in today's more equitable society? Or do health disparities persist in less obvious but no 
less worrying ways -- and not just for African-Americans?

Studies emphatically conclude that such disparities do persist.
U.S. News and World Report released its latest issue announcing the best hospitals in the nation on Tuesday. People put a lot of stock in these rankings, and equality of treatment should be considered as a factor in what makes a hospital excellent.
“Unequal Treatment”, published by the Institute of Medicine in 2002, spelled out exactly how Latinos, African-Americans, Native-Americans, Asian-Americans, and Pacific Islanders receive care that's inferior to that enjoyed by mainstream Americans. The IOM report triggered other studies that demonstrated the (often unconscious) prejudice that prevails in treating women, the elderly, the LGBT community, the obese --13 groups in all -- a large percentage of the health care consuming public.
Here are a few shocking examples: Women with symptoms of heart disease often are not transported by emergency medical services to health facilities as rapidly as men. Women and blacks with heart attack symptoms are not given cardiac catheterizations and other appropriate clinical tests at the same rate as white men. Latinos and African-Americans do not receive the same pain medication for long bone fractures as do their fellow citizens.

According to Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr., “A genuine leader is not a searcher for consensus but a molder of consensus.” 
Dr. King is telling us that if we want to be leaders, we need to lead—that is, we need to develop ideas and convince others of their merit. A leader doesn’t figure out where everyone is going and then jump to the front of the line. A leader chooses a destination, convinces others of the merits of taking the trip, shows them how they can get there, and then leads them on the journey.  Let’s allow the leader in ourselves to be awakened.  Our nation’s health depends on it.
























References:


Monday, October 20, 2014

Blog 6 Harassment in law enforcement workplace



Since the 19th century, women in America have worked in law enforcement. Surprised? Women were mostly relegated to clerical roles or jobs as dispatchers until the women's lib movement of the 1970s, when popular television shows suddenly dramatized the new breed of women cops and detectives. Civil rights and affirmative action laws paved the way for women to assume law enforcement jobs traditionally held by men. Today, women walk the beat, but not without challenges.

Originally called "matrons" when they were first hired by the New York City police department before the turn of the 20th century, female officers really didn't achieve full recognition for a very long time. In the mid-1970s, despite the popularity of television shows like Cagney and Lacy and Charlie's Angels, women only made up 2 percent of the total police work force.

In 1985, Penny Harrington was appointed the first female police chief in the nation, serving in Portland, Oregon. Today, women hold an estimated 12 percent of all law enforcement jobs.
Discrimination against women must be viewed as interlocking process involving the attitude and actions of individuals and the organizations and social structure that guide individual behavior.  Sexual harassment is a form of sex discrimination that violates state and federal law. Sexual harassment decreases organizational productivity and significantly impacts the health of a work environment. In law enforcement, where officers must work long hours and conduct dangerous job tasks, sexual harassment lowers job satisfaction and negatively impacts mission, safety, and results. In spite of these negative consequences, a variety of surveys and studies have demonstrated high levels of sexual harassment in police departments around the world:
·       A survey study among serving policewomen from 35 countries revealed that 77% experienced sexual harassment from colleagues
·       In a study involving a large Midwestern police department, every woman interviewed was subjected to verbal harassment
·       In a 2008 survey, more than half of female officers had experienced sexual harassment in police departments in Australia, Great Britain, and US
The irony is that this discrimination is still ruling our society until today. Women officers, being minorities, are faced by hostile and a discriminatory environment.  Women officers might be retaliated against by supervisors and colleagues on the team because of reporting the harassment.  This happened in Westbrook Maine after 5 years of work in the same place where inequality between males and women is dominant.

T

The findings demonstrate that workplace discrimination is a reality for thousands of workers every year even women officers in law enforcement. The effects on the community can be both mentally and physically devastating. Police officers are generally charged with the protection of the general public, and the maintenance of public order to create a safe and secure environment for all.  If in a specific police location where women officers are being harassed by men officers, what other form of injustice is happening to the public?

References:

Race, Class, And Gender In The United States - Rothenberg

Monday, October 6, 2014

BLOG 5 - Illegal Aliens And The Making Of America


Under federal law, any non-U.S. citizen is an alien. Aliens who have entered the United States without permission, or who have violated the terms of their admission, are identified under the law as illegal aliens. That is a fact, not an issue for debate.

With over 11 million immigrants in the United States illegally (as of 2012), the issue of illegal immigration continues to divide Americans. 

Some people say that illegal immigration benefits the US economy through additional tax revenue, expansion of the low-cost labor pool, and increased money in circulation. They contend that immigrants bring good values, have motivations consistent with the American dream, perform jobs that Americans won’t take, and that opposition to immigration stems from racism. 

Opponents of illegal immigration say that people who break the law by crossing the US border without proper documentation or by overstaying their visas should be deported and not rewarded with a path to citizenship and access to social services. They argue that people in the country illegally are criminals and social and economic burdens to law-abiding, tax-paying Americans. 


Aliens do not enjoy all the privileges of citizenship, but outside of the immigration domain, and in civil society generally, they have the same rights as citizens to equal protection under the Fourteenth Amendment. Legal and political theorists also dispute the implications of the Constitution’s protection of aliens.  While some cite it as evidence of the nation’s inclusive traditions, others worry that the extension of so many rights to aliens diminishes the value of citizenship.  With this dispute evolve the dilemma of deportation of alien parent of an American born baby.
When nursing mothers are torn from their babies, when children come home from school to find their parents missing ... when all this is happening, the system just isn't working and we need to change it.
- U.S. President Barack Obama

A question thousands of other families are wrestling with as a record number of deportations means record numbers of American children being left without a parent. And it comes despite President Barack Obama's promise that his administration would focus on removing only criminals, not breaking up families even if a parent is here illegally.
Nearly 45,000 such parents were removed in the first six months of this year, according to Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE).
Behind the statistics are the stories: a crying baby taken from her mother's arms and handed to social workers as the mother is handcuffed and taken away, her parental rights terminated by a U.S. judge; teenage children watching as parents are dragged from the family home; immigrant parents disappearing into a maze-like detention system where they are routinely locked up hundreds of miles from their homes, separated from their families for months and denied contact with the welfare agencies deciding their children's' fate.
At least 5,100 U.S. citizen children in 22 states live in foster care, according to an estimate by the Applied Research Center, a New York-based advocacy organization, which first reported on such cases last year.
And an unknown number of those children are being put up for adoption against the wishes of their parents, who, once deported, are often helpless to fight when a U.S. judge decides that their children are better off here.



Unfortunately, everyone seems to agree that the current system is broken, but people don't seem to understand that it breaks families too.



Reference:
Paula Rothenberg – Race, Class, and Gender in the United States.